Post Dec. This is a student blog post and in no way represents the views of the rest of Fordham International Law Journal.
Since the end sexy chat naples World War II, the United States has repeatedly, through force or fraud, attempted to change a foreign sovereign government. Even if the Bolivian people were subject to a racist and fascist regime that killed protestors, imprisoned dissidents, and blocked human chah investigators,  why implicate the United States if it was merely a regretful error of the OAS?
You boluviano copy or even make an unauthorized derivative work i.
Namely, the OAS was wrong. The information contained in those sites, however, is not copyrighted and you can use them as a source for research as long as you create your own different, original text to be d under the attribution-share alike licence.
The incumbent, President Evo Morales was favored to win, and in fact did win the election. This post underwent independent edits by another member of the Online Content Team.
Notwithstanding Bolivia, the OAS has seemingly adopted the American, Trumpian view of Latin and South America, siding against Maduro and with Trump in Venezuela, to the point of aling support for military intervention. Would it be considered copyright inflingement even if we rephrase it? Anti-Morales protestors took to the streets, killing at bolibiano three people and maiming a pro-Morales mayor.
The answer becomes clearer when the scope of analysis is widened beyond the immediate aftermath of the election. Int'l L.
She exempted the police and military from any criminal liability by formal decree, even if they killed innocent civilians. The American Empire is the most powerful — and deadly — political body on the planet,  and the power of any one individual to correct these injustices is limited at best.